When The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King launched into theaters December 15, 2003, it had the texture of a big second in Hollywood’s trajectory, not solely from a cultural standpoint (it turned the second-highest grossing blockbuster ever, on the time) however from the standpoint of accelerating Hollywood’s motion towards capitalizing on “franchise IP.”
Hollywood, like all business, is reactive as an alternative of proactive. It’s an business that leaps to capitalize on one thing that has labored, and tries to take advantage of it for all the pieces till the effectively begins to run dry and different market forces take its place to run the cycle once more. Whereas the early 2000s did function different cultural touchstones like The Matrix trilogy, the Harry Potter movies, and the Star Wars prequels, it was Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings that had the form of unanimous consensus of tradition—from audiences, critics, awards our bodies, and business titans (James Cameron, Steven Spielberg, and George Miller have all heaped praises on it)—to outline the primary decade of this century for Hollywood.
Twenty years after the trilogy’s conclusion, the fame of The Lord of the Rings hasn’t modified a lot. It’s nonetheless beloved, although there’s a fixed shuffling within the discourse over which of the three motion pictures was the perfect one. My private opinions on the matter have actually modified on it over time with regard to The Fellowship of the Rings and The Two Towers, however I nonetheless gravitate towards The Return of the King as my favourite. The final movie in a trilogy not often lives as much as expectations, however this was a uncommon case the place Jackson’s conclusion introduced forth all the pieces that completely coalesced what the primary two movies have been constructing on. This isn’t a shock contemplating the filming of the trilogy occurred concurrently from October 1999 to December 2000 earlier than the movies have been launched in consecutive years. It allowed Jackson and his co-screenwriters Philippa Boyens and Fran Walsh to have the ability to keep not solely a continuity within the tone of the storytelling, however a continuity of chemistry among the many forged and crew. Jackson himself famous within the Return of the King DVD commentary that the manufacturing felt like making “the world’s largest house film” due to “the sense of household and neighborhood” on set.
A lot of the novelty and high quality of outdated movie epics comes from innovation, ingenuity, and craft. From George Méliès’s wondrously elaborate units and Buster Keaton’s daring stunts, to the meticulously hand-crafted instruments and weaponry in Ben-Hur, to the infamous and controversial stories from the units of Apocalypse Now and Fitzcarraldo, the miracles of cinema should not solely in what we see, however in how they have been created. With latest information about the impressive practical effects used in Oppenheimer and normal lamentations over the lack of movie craft within the midst of superhero motion pictures’ overuse of inexperienced display screen, it’s maybe one other reminder of how influential and spectacular the work of world-building—which mixed on-location shoots and sensible results with CGI and motion-capture expertise—on Return of the King actually was, and the way it might go on to outline the early twenty first century of Hollywood filmmaking.
Return of the King is in fact well-known for the way it was filmed in a number of the most picturesque places in New Zealand, however many don’t notice how distant these areas actually have been. Greater than 2,000 forged and crew members have been unfold throughout distant areas filming concurrently, and lots of needed to carry survival kits to carry them over in case helicopters and rescue crews weren’t capable of instantly attain them throughout emergencies due to troublesome terrain. Jackson was additionally extraordinarily specific within the set design, artwork route, and costuming of the characters; the trilogy utilized an intensive wardrobe of hand-woven costumes and a warehouse of totally personalized equipment that rivaled the element, care, and quantity of nice epics of the previous.
In a Lord of the Rings oral historical past released by the Independent in 2021, Grant Main, the Oscar-winning set designer of the trilogy, talked about how “it took almost a complete 12 months simply to create the Shire. We’d lay out roads, construct the homes, all of the stone partitions, it was actually like constructing a city. We’d develop and replant flowers, be certain that the grass was the correct size.” In line with Dan Hannah, Main’s longtime colleague and the movie’s Oscar-winning artwork director, “Each single piece was our work. The materials have been homespun, we established our personal pottery, we made the glass, the cutlery in Bilbo’s home was all made. There was nothing within the movies that wasn’t particularly made.”
This stage of detailed craftsmanship wasn’t unusual in Hollywood’s previous, the place one other nice epic, William Wyler’s Ben-Hur, used hand-tooled armor and leather-based from English craftsmen and Italian designers to make greater than 1,000 armored fits and over 100,000 costumes. Likewise, Return of the King’s sensible results additionally prolonged to utilizing age-old optical phantasm methods of compelled perspective—used as early in cinema because the 1909 brief Princess Nicotine, or, The Smoking Fairy and extra famously in Security Final! (1923) and Trendy Occasions (1936)—to permit Gandalf (Ian McKellen) to tower over Hobbits. (In actuality, McKellen is just a few inches taller than any of the actors who play the Hobbits.) Comparable methods have been used to make Gimli seem smaller than Legolas and Aragorn regardless of Jonathan Rhys-Davies being three inches taller than each Orlando Bloom and Viggo Mortensen, respectively.
As a lot because it regarded again on Hollywood’s previous, Return of the King was a landmark achievement in twenty first century movie expertise. Whereas so many items of the movie featured real-life places, different sequences, like Shelob’s Lair (that includes the long-lasting big spider) additionally utilized detailed studio-set constructing with particular results. These have been used as inclement climate emergency units and have been mixed seamlessly with the placement sequences. It ought to be taken as a testomony to how sensible results and CGI should not incompatible or unique of each other however equal instruments within the arms of a filmmaker, studio, and crew who know tips on how to use them effectively.
One of many biggest claims to fame of Return of the King—and Lord of the Rings generally—is within the movement seize expertise used to create Gollum (Andy Serkis). The character blended cutting-edge tech with Serkis’s brilliantly intense bodily efficiency and labored raspy voice, bringing Gollum to life in a startling means. It was so startlingly spectacular that it satisfied James Cameron that visible results expertise had lastly caught up along with his very best imaginative and prescient for Avatar, which might start manufacturing three years after Return of the King’s launch. But it surely’s not solely the tech that ought to be thought of influential right here. Serkis’s efficiency is probably the one most underrated within the twenty first century, from the standpoint of expertise and labor. Each scene Serkis primarily needed to act 3 times, as soon as bodily in a white go well with amongst his fellow actors to seize the actions of the character, then once more in voice-over, then a 3rd time by himself in studio to map the actions for Gollum’s CGI type.
The technological improvements in Return of the King helped type the spine of blockbuster filmmaking as we speak, however compared to the achievements of Jackson and his crew, newer movies can look low-cost and unrefined regardless of utilizing what is taken into account “higher” expertise. One thing has gone lacking. The explanation Return of the King, 20 years later, looks like a pivotal second in Hollywood cinema stays within the methods it maintained the craft and long-haul dedication of filmmaking’s previous, whereas concurrently embracing the expertise of its future. The “franchise IP” label is technically correct for one thing like Lord of the Rings, however that doesn’t fairly really feel proper when utilized to J.R.R. Tolkien’s literary masterwork. In 2023, Hollywood can appear to churn out even large costly productions with little look after element, solely to immediate the creation and anticipation of extra “content material” for the mill; it’s a far cry from the devoted and detailed work that went into making Return of the King, finale pored over by devoted craftsmen who certainly sensed they have been a part of a once-in-a-lifetime achievement.
The discharge of Amazon’s billion-dollar Lord of the Rings streaming sequence, Rings of Energy, was met with a typically constructive response from critics that have been much less about whether or not the present was good and extra in regards to the fact that it looked like it was expensive. For audiences, the sequence may have as well not have been made. It suffered from the identical points as a lot of as we speak’s media does – it appears disappointingly flat and coldly company in execution, capitalizing on nostalgic connections to a beloved IP over actually exploring the literature in enjoyable and fascinating methods. In different phrases, it by no means distinguished itself in a sea of content material overload. And it appears the content material mill isn’t happy but as David Zaslav’s takeover of Lord of the Rings film distributor Warner Bros.—and the dispersing of the Lord of the Rings IP rights throughout a confusing array of holders—included an announcement the place he believed The Lord of the Rings was “nice IP that has been underused”. What an inspiring technique to speak about probably the most revered and influential works of Western literature.
There was a sense whilst I sat within the viewers and the credit rolled on December 17, 2003 that there would by no means be something like this once more. Maybe that is the curse of an achievement this monumental. Like Spielberg’s Jaws, Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King set a excessive mark for the business; it was each a turning level and a sign for the future of Hollywood, in addition to a reminder that the previous could be a useful device in shaping even essentially the most cutting-edge blockbuster.
Need extra io9 information? Try when to anticipate the newest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s subsequent for the DC Universe on film and TV, and all the pieces you must find out about the way forward for Doctor Who.
Trending Merchandise
